So now I’m asking myself, “if it normally takes 30 days for a congressional response from the DoJ, then why haven’t I heard anything from Charlie Crist, whom submitted an official request to the DoJ and congressional intelligence agency back in January? That’s a little more than 30 days.
A few weeks ago I spoke with Ann Vandersteel on her program, ‘Steel Truth.’ During the interview we discussed the multiple, official requests I have made to my previous Congressman, Charlie Crist and my new Congressman, Gus Bilirakis. Although these requests have been numerous and officially filed since 2017, I’ve taken more aggressive measures with official, on the record requests for answers since this past December.
On or around December 18th, as it was becoming clear the Special Counsel’s report was going to be released soon, I went to speak directly with Elizabeth Hittos, the chief of staff for my previous Congressman. I moved from his district in 2017 but had submitted information to Gus before the 2016 Presidential election stating that I believed the ShadowNet, which I had pioneered in from 2007-2010 for Obama’s National Security Advisor, Gen. James Jones, while working for a small, family owned business Jones had, was being used to influence the 2016 Presidential elections.
I showed Elizabeth a chart that now tied 8 people and 2 private companies directly to Robert Mueller’s indictments, and reminded her that I was giving Gus another chance to make this right. I mean, imagine if Gus would have acted on my warning – the same warning I spoke about in radio and other interviews at that same time? We might not have spent the last two-years talking about the Russian collusion story that we now know is directly connected in a major way to the fabricated dossier and its dissemination.
So during my meeting in December 2018 with Elizabeth, she looked over the indisputable documented evidence I presented her with, picked up the phone, and called the chief of staff to Devin Nunes, and left a voicemail. Her voicemail stated that her constituent had evidence for Robert Mueller showing Obama, his National Security Adviser, John McCain an others direct involvement in the fabricated Russian dossier.
I followed up with an email to her the first week of January 2019 and Elizabeth replied that she would send a follow-up email to congressman Nunes, and that was the last time she ever replied.
Because I had moved to a new congressional district, I decided to file the same, official request thru my new Congressman, Charlie Crist. I went to his office in St. Petersburg, FL. and spoke with his veteran’s liason, Gersham. I got a copy of my official request and then waited. I tried calling back a month later and nobody would return my call, so I drove back down in person. They told me that they just faxed an updated request to find out the status.
I was then called back by Gersham and he told me the congressional intelligence committee had asked me to fax over the new information I had, and I asked Gersham if he would be able to do that for me, as I didn’t have a fax. He said he would. I followed up with a phone call to the congressional intelligence committee and confirmed they had received the fax from Congressman Crist, and that they would be getting in touch with me shortly. That was in February.
A week later I called the congressional intelligence committee to ask why nobody has called me back, and expressed concern that the Special Counsel was going to end before ever speaking to the person that literally built the same social media influence capability Paul Manafort and others that were under indictment for social media influence operations. One would kinda think such information would be significant for them to have, right?
So last month I moved again back to Gus Bilirakis’ district and filed an official request with them for answers to this multitude of official requests for a classified briefing. I let a month go by and last week again reached out for a status, and heard nothing from Gus. So I reached out to some friends that knew Elizabeth Hittos and asked them to help. I said I was running out of options, and was literally planning to stand out in front of his office with a bullhorn if they continued to ignore me. Yesterday I got the following response:
If you think that was it with my story of political games, just look at this text response from Judge Jeanine’s personal cell phone, keeping in mind I had originally spoken with Judge Jeannine on December 18th when you notice the date of her text. Never heard back from the “honorable” (joke) Judge Jeannine Pirro.
And if that seems like a BS thing to do to someone you have promised to help, take a look at these lies from our beloved, Sarah Carter. The text didn’t come in on my phone in order, so I put numbers to make reading it more understandable. Sarah was, of course, full of crap and never did a damn thing she said in this text, or in the 1.5 hours I spent on the phone with her.
So, I’m making some progress here. Ann had asked me on her show to let her know if I hear anything back from my official requests. Although I haven’t heard anything back from now 2 official Inspector General complaints I filed with the DoJ IG, I have now heard back, (finally) from congressman Gus Bilirakis, and will keep updating as any information comes in. Here is a link to my interview with Ann Vandersteel.
This is why we need The American Awakening! Fake news media and politicians are going to continue placing profit and company before country if we don’t take matters into our own hands. Even though I’m partly responsible for contributing to the degradation of trust in social media and elections, I have a way to fix it, but it can only be done thru The American Awakening, and only with your help!
Just before the 2018 mid-term elections, I met Lindsey Graham at an event in Orlando, FL. I told Lindsey that I built the same social media psychological warfare capabilities for Obama that we indicted the 13 Russians for, and that Paul Manafort was our partner.
Lindsey instructed me to give his staffer the copy of my book I brought for him which explains it in more detail, then shook my hand and took a the picture with me below. I have since then sent by both email and facsimile additional, newly discovered information in official, documented requests for a classified briefing with the Senate Judiciary Committee. I’ve heard nothing but crickets from Mr. Graham.
Lindsey is now on a ‘McCain like’ fake news tour claiming he believe’s the Special Counsel’s report that pins the DNC email “hack” on Russia. As you can see in my speech just a few days before Lindsey started his unapologetic Russian collusion tour, I was speaking at the Tea Party Manatee club discussing the very fact that there was NO POSSIBLE WAY any intelligence agency can definitively say whom was responsible.
The technical reason my assessment is different from the intelligence report is because they are using breadcrumbs of evidence provided to them by a private, 3rd-party tech company the DNC provided. Additionally, I have evidence that connects that tech company to the Israeli company Mueller’s indictments pointed to named Wikistrat, and its sister corporation, Psy-Group.
Watch below then please explain to me how Lindsey can say with a straight face to the American people that he knows without question the DNC “hacking” was by Russian state actors? As you will see, I’m not sympathetic or naive to Russia messing with America; it’s kinda their thing.
As you will see in my chart connecting the ShadowNet to these two companies and 8 other people to the Russian dossier, one of Lindsey Graham’s closest friends, John McCain, is directly tied to the ShadowNet, fabricated Russian dossier and likely even the DNC email socially engineered influence operation (not “hacking”).
In this video I explain the connections in the chart above.
What we need now is for Senator Lindsey Graham to explain how his best friend, former Senator John McCain, is directly connected to the ShadowNet I developed for Obama’s National Security Advisor.
Graham has known about this since I believe before the 2018 mid-term elections, and I believe had he investigated what you have just seen in the video above, the results of the mid-term elections would have been a lot different. Imagine if we had been discussing Obama’s actual connection to the ShadowNet instead of the fabricated “Russian collusion” hoax we got – LIKELY USING THE SHADOWNET!!!
Sorry for shouting there, but this DC swamp BS really gets frustrating and I could use your help. Please share this to your friends, groups, elected officials and the media. If enough people ask them, they won’t be able to continue covering it up…
From 2007-2010 I worked in pioneering social media psychological warfare capabilities for the Department of Defense. I was recently asked on Facebook what the “ShadowNet” & “iPsy,” which was its commercially marketed name, not the classified code-name; was built for?
The ShadowNet and iPsy were built to support what is known in military nomenclature as IIA, or Interactive Internet Activities. Here is the military’s definition.
The ShadowNet and its relational database, iPsy, served basically two distinctive purposes. The ShadowNet was used to provide anonymity (non-attribution) and dissemination of whatever content or message your wanted to get out to control the narrative. As seen above, IIA supports Computer Network Operations. CNO, for example, could be honeypots, hacking, computer virus… Does this remind you of anything? DNC emails are stolen, then disseminated using sophisticated anonymity which, in my opinion was used to create a “false flag” that pointed the intrusion at Russia.
Think of the ShadowNet as a project management tool for either covert, (using anonymity, fake persona’s and often times fabricated news) to disseminate your message in a way that is 100% unattributable to the analyst sending the message), or overtly, through attributable government organizations like Voice of American or the Public Affairs Office.
I’m only going to tell you what it was capable of, nothing operational. That would violate national security laws, and also violate the sacred trust given with my clearance. It is up to you what you do with this information. I suggest letting your elected officials know if it is something you think has been abused and our nation should have a debate on.
This would be especially useful in situations like the dissemination of the fabricated Russian Dossier and the DNC email scandal as just 2 examples. Here is a recent article I wrote about an IIA/IO operation in Afghanistan that was used by a U.S. Military PSYOP team against sitting U.S. Senator’s in an attempt to get additional funding for the war.
I found it interesting that most people only noticed the fact the U.S. Military used covert, tactical psychological warfare against American Senators, and not the most interesting and concerning part, developing psychological profiles on the TA’s, or Target Acquisitions.
When people think of using social media as a way to influence using psychological warfare, they generally first think of thousands of fake Russian bots engaging on Facebook and Twitter. What is rarely discussed is the intelligence collection process that is used to understand your target(s) for the most effective results.
Mueller’s Special Counsel has indicted 2 companies, Wikistrat & Psy-Group, which are Israeli owned by Joel Zamel. According to an article in the New York Times, Psy-Group , a company that provides the exact same services that iPsy was built to do, presented the Trump campaign with a quote to build detailed, psychological profiles on Republican delegates during the highly contested 2016 Republican convention. The article states there was no evidence the Trump campaign used this service, but it wouldn’t have been illegal.
Another presidential convention in 2008 had a very contested convention, and president Obama went on to tap the owner of the ShadowNet as his National Security Advisor. Perhaps Democrats should look into this?
Patrick Bergy; Original ShadowNet developer.
This process involves not only collecting your likes, things you share and your friends to build a behavioral profile, it now includes a the real-time collection of a targets social media, credit history, financials, travel and criminal records. Components of the ShadowNet and iPsy were integrated into a new application called ClearForce, by Dynology. The ClearForce application was then turned into its own company and includes on its board former Obama CIA director, Michael Hayden, Obama’s National Security Advisor and NATO commander, Gen. James Jones, and a California Democrat Congresswoman/ Diane Feinstein campaign manager. Here is a short video I made to show what I’m talking about.
Having studied the Seth Rich incident from the perspective of a subject matter expert in both cyber-security and social media psychological warfare, I believe Seth Rich was chosen as a target. In such a scenario, a company not unlike ClearForce would use an application like ClearForce to do a detailed psychological profile on everyone with potential access to the leaked DNC emails.
The ClearForce “like” application would then use its artificial intelligence to build detailed behavioral psychological profiles, and the targets most likely susceptible to a socially engineered influence operation that gets your TA to steal the data for you.
As stated, I have no evidence of this, but the question doesn’t have to just be if they did it, it can also be about should we allow private companies owned by senior White House officials and Democrat Congresswomen to have this ability?
On Tuesday, March 12th, I was the keynote speaker at the Citrus County Trump Republican Club. During the event I told the audience of I believe over a hundred people that it has been an absolute disgrace how our nations 4th estate has not just ignored my story, several have investigated it, never disputed a single claim, then just went silent. If you agree their behavior was lacking both professionalism and honor, please let them know. I’ve included their social media contact information at the end of this article. In my last text to them I said I wouldn’t contact them again. I didn’t say you wouldn’t…
Washington Post investigative “journalist,” Craig Timburg, (and others) spent over a month going back and fourth with me until he eventually told me they weren’t going to run the story because it didn’t indict Trump and didn’t fit their narrative. I was disappointed but not really surprised by WaPo, but what has happened with Fox News since December 18th 2018 surprised me, and it shocked pretty much everyone at the event, so I wanted to address it in more detail and you can make your own conclusions.
Below is a link to my speaking engagement in Citrus County. It was recorded by George Colella. The video is around 50 minutes, but well worth watching. I’ll try to update this post later with the exact time in the video I spoke about Judge Jeanine. The first question at the very end was about Fox News covering my story up.
On November 8th 2017 I called Robert Mueller’s office. I informed them I had worked for the former NATO Supreme Allied Commander from 2007-2010, developing the same social media psychological warfare applications the FBI recently indicted 13 Russians for. It was called the ShadowNet, and I told the special counsel staff our partner at the time was Paul Manafort. That seems significant, right? Just wait!
My efforts to warn Americans that both foreign and domestic threat-actors were using covert social media psychological warfare to influence the outcome of the 2016 Presidential had not gone well. My first attempts to notify the media goes back to around September 2015 with some local NPR public radio station, but they didn’t care because it was an indictment of Obama, best I could determine. WMNF was then followed by investigative journalist, Mark Douglas, with WFLA, News Channel 8. WFLA is a big media outlet which is arguably the most dominant media presence in the Tampa Bay area. WFLA refused to investigate or run the story.
It was around the end of 2015 that I realized the media were not interested in writing a story about how I pioneered social media fake news for Obama and the former NATO Supreme Allied Commander, so I started writing my book. The book was also an insurance policy in the event I was killed to keep what I was exposing quiet, and it is a fear I still feel today.
I tried reaching out to Mark Douglas around a year later after I had discovered the connection between Paul Manafort and the ShadowNet program I helped pioneer. I also mentioned to him at that time my book had resulted in a DoD investigation into the cover-up of a pedophile in Iraq involving Gen. James Jones, his son, Gen. Petraeus and several others, but WFLA and Mark Douglas didn’t think this was something the public deserved or needed to know either, and refused to run it.
Then on December 18th, 2018 I get the private cell number of Judge Jeannine Pirro, the host of “Judge Jeanine” on Fox. I call her up and to my surprise, she answers. I told her briefly, like in 30 seconds that I had pioneered the same social media psychological warfare applications we indicted the Russians for, but did it for Obama’s National Security Advisor, and Paul Manafort was our partner. The Judge told me she was just getting ready to go into the doctors office, and that should would discuss it with me later.
A few days passed and I didn’t hear from her. Fearing she thought I was just crazy, I sent a follow-up text message (See Below.)
As you can see in the text I sent her, I told her I was a man of honor and integrity. I said if I don’t hear from you, I won’t bother you again. To me, her response was an acceptance to act honorably. Her response (captioned below) was, “working on this now.”
On February 2nd, 2019 I sent a follow-up text to Judge Jeanine. I sent her one other previous text January 2nd stating I knew she was a very busy person and asked if there was someone on her staff I could speak with; she never replied. I hadn’t heard from her for nearly 2.5 months so I sent her another follow-up text, (shown below.) I included a picture of me in uniform, and said, “I believe you to be someone of honor and integrity, just as I…”
Much to my surprise, Jeanine replied, “I will speak to congressman [sic]nunes re ur information.”
It is March 13th and she has never replied. However, not to worry! I’ve been working with investigative “journalist,” Sara Carter since January 13!!! Sara’s got my back, right?
Sara and I spoke for I believe over an hour that night over the phone. She was blown away!
I spent the next week blocking off my schedule at the times Sara asked me to be available for her to call, but each time she never called. In most cases she never even replied for a day or two. Ok, no problem; she’s a busy professional and I will give her time. I sent her a lot of information – at her request – making sure it wasn’t bother her.
*The text came in out of sequence, so I put numbers to represent the proper order.
The above reply from Sara was Thursday, February 7th, 2019!
Sara has never contacted me back since; where is the honor in that? This is a very personal issue to me, both as a patriot and a man that has seen his life destroyed by these people for doing his job and protecting national security. I get it, I’m nothing to someone like 4-star General James Jones or Fox News, but I have more honor that the lot of them, and that’s ok with me. My work isn’t done.
Myself and several friends have setup an Indiegogo crowdfunding campaign to raise money for my next book, “ShadowNet: The American Awakening.” I am using this, my now 2nd book, to expose the fraud, waste, abuse and corruption within our 4th estate and the Military Industrial Complex.
Please help contribute by either donating to our Indiegogo project or sharing it with friends and family.
According to numerous reports, including this NYT article from October 2007, the McCain presidential campaign paid the social media company, 3EDC, more than a million dollars, which was about 1/10 of their entire campaign budget at the time when Rick Davis took over John McCain campaign in 2007. 3EDC was founded by a former partner of Rick Davis, Paul Manafort. As you can see in the New York Times article below, there were other concerning relationships with 3EDC, most of which flew in the face of McCain’s own politics. The new connection I have just made verifiably adds Chinese Intelligence/Influence to this mystery.
I would also add when you read further down below that you notice how crappy a website 3EDC was. For a company paid nearly $3 million for web services by McCain’s campaign and the RNC, 3EDC sure sucked at making their own website. I guess it’s just a case of, “the plumbers leaky pipes?”
NYT October 2007 – “All told, 3eDC billed the campaign more than $1 million for Web services during the first half of the year. (The amount still owed the company accounts for about a third of the campaign’s debt.) News reports also noted that Davis Manafort, the business development and consulting practice from which Mr. Davis is on leave, had been giving campaign advice to the Ukrainian prime minister, Viktor F. Yanukovich, a favorite of the Kremlin, whose power Mr. McCain often warns against.”
The NYT article goes on to report the campaign was seemingly pulled from political ashes by a viral social media posting showing John McCain service videos. It was published by a group called Foxhole Productions.
NYT October 2007 – “And when high-priced media consultants left the financially struggling campaign, a group of loyalists working for little or no money made a searing television commercial showing footage of Mr. McCain as a prisoner of war. The group that made the advertisement called itself Foxhole Productions.”
I cannot prove it, but having spent years pioneering social media psychological warfare for the Department of Defense, and Foxhole Productions sounds an awful lot like what in military psychological warfare nomenclature is know as IIA, or Interactive Internet Activities.
I developed IIA for a company called Dynology from October 2007- April 2010. Dynology was owned by a lifelong friend of John McCain; Gen. James Jones. Dynology was a very small, family owned business in which nearly 1/3 of the 15 employees when I started were immediate members of Gen. Jones’s family.
One of the products I helped pioneer for Dynology was known as the ShadowNet and its relational database, iPsy. In simplest terms, the ShadowNet and iPsy were marketed by Dynology commercially, and had the ability to alter the outcome of any size election. It was built to provide the exact same covert, social media psychological warfare capabilities we indicted the 13 Russians for last summer. Only difference is the ShadowNet was built and owned by the former NATO Supreme Allied Commander. Wow, that’s kinda awkward…
Here is a copy of the original Dynology “ShadowNet” commercial marketing slick.
Now take a look at this Google WayBack Machine capture of 3EDC’s website on March 4th, 2007 below. It is from their “about” page and describes their tools, “…to affect results in the political, social, and commercial worlds.” I’m pretty sure anyone working with me developing IIA in Iraq at the same time 3EDC is selling these micro-targeted social media capabilities to John McCain’s presidential campaign would be EXTREMELY worried.
This is when I found something extremely disturbing, and I am calling on the FBI to investigate this further. Notice the public website Paul Manafort’s company 3EDC is using is at www.3edc.NET (I capitalized NET to highlight its significance.) Notice the email address is not @3edc.net, it is @3edc.com
This is an english translation of 3EDC.com’s website several months after the info@3EDC.com email address was listed on the Manafort/Davis corporate site. I would like for ANYONE in U.S. Intelligence to tell me hosting or purchasing anything from that company used in a presidential campaign isn’t an IMMEDIATE red-flag!
From translation – As a Chinese joint venture company of Sakura Internet Co., Ltd. (TSE Mothers listing list 3778, Japan’s top backbone capacity No. 1), since May 2006, we have been conducting Internet hosting business by self-contract data center in Shanghai.
Why is a person like me with over a decade with the Department of Defense information security concerned when I see a presidential candidate with potential ties to Chinese influence and intelligence? Because this presidential candidate also had a nickname of “Songbird” McCain, and it has been long suspected that Chinese Intelligence had tapes of Songbird McCain singing like a bird to North Vietnamese Intelligence Officers, that’s why…
I am asking our law enforcement to look into this. I can think of a 1000 ways this relationship looks treasonous, and only about 1 way it could be coincidental. I’m hoping someone else might pick this up and peer-review it for accuracy. Please, tell me I made an obvious mistake here, but I just can’t see how.
Based on what I can see and know, it seems to me like Paul Manafort’s company, 3EDC, may have been the source of the data spillage/breach, but it seems more like there was a relationship between the Chinese Intelligence agency and 3EDC, and not a criminal/victim one you would expect to see.
That said, this new information forces me to change my odds on this being coincidental or not known to Manafort went from 1000 ways it looks treasonous, to two ways it could just be a coincidence. If 3EDC was a Chinese hosted and apparently owned domain, that could easily, and in fact be highly likely, a false-flag. Just thought I would add that little nugget in as well 🙂
Did Paul Manafort, John McCain and The RNC Pay $4 Million for Covert, Military Grade, Social Media Psychological Warfare in 2008?
With Paul Manafort’s political baggage, why did anyone ever recommend Manafort to work for the Trump campaign?
By Patrick Bergy
31 October, 2017 – Tampa, FL. – Having both served in the U.S. Army, and worked as a private contractor in the military industrial complex for over a decade combined, I’m not a big believer in coincidence as it relates to politics and the DC Swamp, and this story from the Washington Post back in June, 2008, didn’t help.
I worked for the defense contracting company, Dynology, for over 8 years. It was a small company owned by General James L. Jones, and I answered directly to his son, Dynology’s president, Jim Jones. I spent over 6 of those years deployed overseas in Iraq and South Korea providing contract support for Dynology in support of the Department of Defense. My career was ended in May, 2015, after filing an official report of fraud, waste, and abuse. within 24 hours of filing that report, the contract I had been supporting for over 5 years, was modified by the very people I profiled in my official report.
Within a few days of me leaving the contract, it was magically modified back to its original requirements, and my position was replaced. I was denied whistleblower protection by the Inspector General, not based on any merits of my official reports, but because I was a contractor, and told I wasn’t covered under whistleblower protection, even though the IG’s very own website stated that contractors had been added under whistleblower protection since 2013. I tried every legal means within the system to find justice, and when all other means failed, I took to social media to try and get support, and have my story heard. I recently published my first book, ‘Victim of the Swamp: How the “Deep State” Destroyed the 40-Year-Old Private’ as yet another attempt to expose the decade of systemic fraud, waste, and abuse I experienced between our government, military, and the military industrial complex.
So, back to the Washington Post story. According to the report,
“the RNC and 3eDC have apparently been negotiating a larger contract for the firm to overseemicrotargeting, a deal that could be worth $2 million or $3 million.“
Here are some facts The Washington Post didn’t know when they wrote the article in 2008, and I’ll let you decide if it’s all just a coincidence. Just as the Washington Post, I am not accusing anyone of anything, I am merely pointing out facts. It is up to American’s that read this to make their own conclusions.
Fact #1 – 3eDC was an internet firm owned by Richard “Rick” Davis, then McCain 08′ campaign manager, and Paul Manafort, whom I think can best be described as a political “fixer,” and international man of mystery. Many news organizations felt it was inappropriate for McCain to be paying Paul Davis through his company, 3eDC, when his campaign was struggling financially, and Davis had said he would “forego” his campaign salary. I would also be in that camp.
“NEWSWEEK. Federal campaign records show the McCain campaign paid Davis Manafort $90,000 through July 2007, when a cash crunch prompted Davis and other top campaign officials to forgo their salaries and work as volunteers. Separately, another entity created and partly owned by Davis– an Internet firm called 3eDC, whose address was the same office building as Davis Manafort’s–received payments from the McCain campaign for Web services, collecting $971,860 through March 2008.”
Fact #2 – What was 3eDC? According to a Google “Wayback Machine” capture of 3eDC’s website from 2008, “3eDC was established to develop cutting edge web and data tools… designed to connect people and to affect the results in the political, social, and commercial worlds.”
When I saw the Washington Post report the RNC was in negotiations to pay 3eDC for “Microtargeting,” and then saw the company, Dynology, everything started to fall in place for me. I had spent from 2007-2010 pioneering microtargeting, social media psychological warfare application for on a DoD contract in Iraq, and also back in Tampa, at McDill, and it made me wonder… Notice Dynology is listed as 3eDC’s top Strategic Partner – forgoing alphabetical order.
According to the Washington Post, “the RNC and 3eDC have apparently been negotiating a larger contract for the firm to oversee microtargeting, a deal that could be worth $2 million or $3 million…”
Fact #3 – Dynology Strategic Partnership. A couple quick facts: Dynology is owned by the 4 Star General, James Jones. To understand Gen. Jones’ moral compass, it was a family owned business that was making millions of dollars from Department of Defense contracts, both while Gen. Jones was in uniform serving as NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander, and while also serving as Obama’s National Security Advisor from 2009-2010. I’m sorry, but in what world is it honorable, or even legal for that matter, for someone in uniform, or sitting at the right-hand of a U.S. president as his National Security Advisor, while at the same time your family owned and run defense contracting company is profiting millions in Department of Defense contracts.
Perhaps it explains how he can afford this house, as was reported by Angelajean? If you read her post, you will notice in her description of General Jones, there is no mention of his relationship with Dynology, yet he has the largest office in Dynology’s headquarters, on the 15th floor of the Towers Crescent building, one of the most premier high rise buildings in Tyson’s Corner, VA. In fact, try doing a Google search looking for any relationship with General James L. Jones and Dynology, and you will find virtually nothing. He founded it early in 2000 or 2001, and has profited millions from its Department of Defense and Marine Corp. contracts for nearly two decades now. General Jones openly boasts of his membership publicly on many other boards, and his position in many other corporations and non-profits. Why is there virtually nothing to the fact Dynology was being run by his two sons, and many other family members, as well as his massive private office suite in such a luxurious building? I think most can make their own conclusions based on the facts.
Fact #4 – Dynology (Gen. Jones) was paid a tremendous amount of taxpayer funds to send me to Iraq on an Interactive Internet Activities (IIA) Defense Department contract to build social media psychological warfare applications that were capable of covertly “microtargeting” (sound familiar) social network users. I’m not acknowledging ANYTHING we may or may not have done with it, as any of the dissemination process or actual projects would be classified at the Top Secret level! Additionally, Dynology maintained the intellectual property rights to the application, and made it commercially available to the public. Understanding the potential for such an application to be misused, I was personally troubled by this at the time, but never spoke out. Below is a screenshot of the application, notice the copyright Dynology 2009 at the bottom of the application window. The only thing I discuss is what the application is capable of when it was made publicly available.
Fact #5 – Think of iPSY (what I named it for commercial sale at Dynology) as a “Fake News” project management tool. Let’s say you woke up one day and wanted to alter the outcome of an election, or start riots that spread across the United States, like what we witnessed in Ferguson. (I actually saw this happening in 2014 and spoke out, but nobody listened, until a few weeks ago when Facebook and the FBI acknowledged it.) If you did decide to go such an unscrupulous route, you would require a project management tool exactly like this.
Fact #6 – If you think it’s just a coincidence Paul Manafort, John McCain, Richard Davis and the RNC was funneling millions of dollars into a project billed as “microtargeting” using 3eDC, a social media influence company, and a Strategic Partner with Dynology, think about this. It’s not like you can call up ‘The Geek Squad’ and ask, “do you sell covert, social media PSYOP project management applications capable of microtargeting specific demographics in Facebook, Twitter using multiple fake persona’s? Projects that “effect the results in the political, social and commercial worlds,” as 3eDC boasted on their website, which is exactly what iPSY was designed to do, are very well funded, covert and tactical. How many U.S. companies in 2007 actually had this capability outside, or within, the military industrial complex? The answer to that is like one or two, including Dynology in that figure. I also worked a contract in Afghanistan for another company for a few months on an Interactive Internet Activities project. I know what I am talking about here.
Fact #7 – Why covert, well, for two reasons. First, when you’re managing a small group of analysts (maybe 10-15) using multiple fake social media “persona’s,” (maybe 10-25 fake persona per analyst,) trained in psychological warfare to disseminate a particular narrative, you might have a problem if your opponent found out and made it public. You can’t have anyone tracing it back to you. You must be able to make it look like your anyone you want, coming from anywhere in the world you want to make it look like you’re coming from, and do it in such a way that no intelligence agency on the planet could tell. Second, many blog sites and social networks have site administrators that look at where you’re internet IP address is located, as well as many other characteristics of you and your computers profile. Look at what Facebook just admitted to congress about identifying over 250 fake persona’s coming from a single location in Russia. If a group of fake persona’s all show up using the same software, computer profiles, and are all from the same physical location in Tyson’s Corner, VA., you would busted. It is for that very reason I strongly question the U.S. intelligence assessments that Russia was actually doing this.
Firstly, you wouldn’t have a team of 250 people, that would be ridiculous to manage and maintain anonymity. You would use a small, 10-15 person group of highly skilled analysts, and project managers that had years of experience in Psychological Warfare. Second, the only “breadcrumbs” the program would leave that could trace back to anyone, would be what they wanted you to find. Having Facebook and U.S. intelligence agencies so quickly and easily find a group of 250 Russians, on a project they claim was budgeted at close to $100 million, makes me think it is more likely someone in the U.K., like GCHQ, which would seemingly love to bring us to war with Russia based on their recent actions.
After going to war in Iraq based on false intelligence, I’m sorry, but I need to see more evidence before I get on board with the Russia scandal. I openly acknowledge Russia uses social media to influence the U.S., but the actual stuff they are doing, we wouldn’t know about, and won’t for years, if ever. They’re some of the best, if not the best, on the planet at this stuff (after me, of course.)
Fact #8 – On March 22, 2017, the Associated Press reported,
“Manafort was paid $10 million from 2006 to 2009 to lobby on behalf of the Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska, a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, using a strategic “model” that the AP said Manafort wrote would “greatly benefit the Putin Government if employed at the correct levels with the appropriate commitment to success.”
It deeply concerns me that the timing of 3eDC’s reported payments by McCain and the RNC, as well as descriptions like “microtargeting,” and “affect the results in the political, social, and commercial worlds,” is used by a company that was seemingly propped up overnight as a front under suspicious circumstances. If Dynology did license military grade, social media psychological warfare technology it was contracted to build by the Department of Defense, commercially, what steps would have been taken to prevent it falling into the hands of our foreign adversaries? Especially given the report by AP listed above describing Paul Manafort’s talks with close allies of the Russian President Vladimir Putin around 2006.
Fact #9 – Even if the Strategic Relationship between Dynology and 3eDC, as well as the descriptions of services, was all just a coincidence, I don’t believe it should just be ignored. It should be investigated! Paul Manafort was just indicted on multiple charges relating to money laundering, and numerous accusations by news outlets and foreign leaders for interfering with elections well before he got involved with the Trump campaign. Manafort’s moral piggy bank seems to have a few “IOU’s” in it? Then you have, in my personal opinion, a morally bankrupt, 4 star General owning a defense contracting company making millions on Defense Department contracts, both while in uniform, and while serving as National Security Advisor. You have Rick Davis owning a business, 3eDC, that is taking in money from the very campaign (John McCain’s Straight Talk Express) he is managing, as well as the RNC reportedly giving him many millions more through that very same company. McCain’s Straight Talk Express seems less like an “Express,” and more like a commuter service, making stops at every lobbying firm and donor kickback it sees, in my personal opinion.
finally, what was the RNC and others around Trump supposedly tasked with protecting him thinking when they recommended Paul Manafort work for the Trump campaign? I get it, Trump hasn’t been in politics like the rest of these folks, how was it ever a good idea in anyone’s mind to allow this to happen? Something here smells very “swamp like” and fishy, if you ask me.
Events Suggest The Deep State is Blackmailing Our Justice Department!
The “Deep State” is not some mystical, monolithic cabal that exists within our government and bent on world domination. I would argue it is a handful of former senior intelligence officials which own privately held corporations that profit from government contracts. Their power is derived from intelligence data they either obtained during their time as heads of intelligence agencies, and from the government contracts which allow them to collect the intelligence data. It’s about greed, and nothing else.
As just one of many examples, the private military contracting company, ClearForce, is under the governance of a former National Security Advisor, his son, and former head of the CIA. The sole purpose of the ClearForce application is to provide companies that have employees with clearances a predictive behavioral threat assessment. This automated process combines data collected from employees both at work and off. It uses data collected from social media posts, credit agencies, law enforcement and other “anonymized” sources according to ClearForce’s own website, whatever that means? My background in intelligence collection suggests anonymized as generally relating to COVERT, or hidden surveillance.
Whether you believe them to be acting nefariously or not, I believe these people jeopardize the integrity of America’s laws, and do so for the purpose of profit. What if they found out, whether from their previous positions as heads of America’s most powerful intelligence agencies, or through intelligence contracts with their companies, that a current or former Attorney General, Senator, or member of Congress had done something illegal, and used this information to keep them from ever being investigated? Did they, I have no idea, but could they, absolutely yes they could if they so desired.
During Jeff Sessions recent testimony, he was asked if the deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein, could investigate himself, which should be a seemingly very simple answer for anyone, NO! Instead, AG Sessions defended Rosenstein as being a good and honorable man, and left it up to him.
I don’t care how good and honorable you are, the integrity of our entire Justice Department is jeopardized if you allow the head of an intelligence agency to investigate themselves.
Look at the money now retired general Jones made in defense department contracts while he was the NATO Supreme Allied Commander, and as Obama’s National Security Advisor. His family owned defense contracting company made millions of dollars in defense contracts while in office. Would someone that would do something like that use information he collected to blackmail a sitting Attorney General or head of the FBI to ensure questions were not asked about his business dealings? I don’t know, but that is why they shouldn’t be allowed to do it, which is the only way you could be sure they wouldn’t.
Our nations only defense from foreign and domestic threats comes from America’s Department of Justice and FBI. For the Deep State to exist, they must control these organizations from the top. My case in point would be the testimony before the Senate of both former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and current Attorney General, Jeff Sessions.
During the Senate testimony of AG Lynch in the summer of 2016, she was repeatedly asked under oath if it was illegal to knowing divulge Top Secret classified information to someone without the appropriate clearance. To anyone that holds a clearance, that answer is very simple, with the apparent exception of then Attorney General Lynch, whom refused to acknowledge it would be illegal after being repeatedly asked under oath. She was, of course, protecting Hillary Clinton from an email Hillary sent to a staffer that didn’t want to send a classified email on an unclassified network. This staffer was instructed by Hillary in her email response to simply remove the SECRET classification header from the top of the classified email, and send it to her that way. In case you’re wondering, if something labeled as classified is no longer classified because you have removed the classified label at the top of the page, it is not, and that is TOTALLY illegal.
So when I ask myself why would such highly educated people – the top attorneys in our country – ignore or defend such obviously unethical or criminal behavior? The only reason I can think of is that someone has information that could destroy their careers or land them in prison, and they’re being blackmailed. Nothing else makes any sense, and is it so hard to believe? Our intelligence agencies are out of control with the illegal collection of phone calls, emails and other data.
They justify the warrantless collection of this data to American’s saying it is all carefully controlled through FISA courts, but everyone knows that’s not true, and has witnessed countless times these protocols have been circumvented. Even if you ignore the mountains of evidence release by Edward Snowden and how it has been abused by our intelligence agencies, the leaks following the election of President Trump is evidence of massive abuse. Those of you on the left whom think this is all good, should think very carefully, because it will most likely happen to you next time…
I go into this and much more in my book, Victim of the Swamp: How the “Deep State” Destroyed the 40-Year-Old Private. It is available now in paperback both on Amazon, and at my GoFundMe campaign: www.GoFundMe.com/VictimOfTheSwamp
Voice of America Pushes Iran Propaganda Using MSNBC Producers; Report Claims Anti-US Narrative – None Spoke Farsi!
So much in the news today are stories about fake news, so I would like to take a moment and help you understand what #FakeNews truly is. As a subject matter expert in social media psychological warfare, this comment caught my eye. In a recent tweet by President Trump he made a very carefully crafted claim;
“…It is very possible that those sources don’t exist but are made up by fake news writers. #FakeNews is the enemy!”
This was not said by accident! You know the president has access to pretty much everything in the intelligence world at the highest levels of classification. That said, this post is about #FakeNews at the unclassified level called Voice of America. It is a taxpayer funded, self-licking ice cream cone of appropriations which seems to be lacking in oversight. What the president was referring to were state or privately funded IIA (Interactive Internet Activities) tactical social media PSYOP campaigns. Often these operations will include IO, or Information Operations, which involves more clandestine/anonymized tactical operations, often which tie into a main IIA operation.
The reports surrounding the performance of both VOA TV and Radio broadcast starts out with 2 scathing reports by Senator Tom Coburn to President George W. Bush.
“Undermines U.S. policy on Iran, often even supporting the propaganda of the Islamic Republic of Iran.”
You will not believe the examples the report sites, it will make you either laugh until you cry, or just simply cry? A pro American narrative is in VOA’s mission statement, and they reportedly had requested an additional $50 million in taxpayer funding from the Congress just the previous year. Yes, the good old days when money was no object in the Middle East for stuff that doesn’t work. Perhaps this seemingly impossible to believe report will make a little more sense when I tell you that VoA hired MSNBC producers, and they didn’t speak Farsi, the primary language.
For those of you that have never heard of Voice of America (VOA,) it is essentially a crappy version of Russia’s far more popular, RT (Russian TV.) A good analogy would be to compare the ratings of FOX News and MSNBC, as a good example. To keep it simple (and historically accurate) we can use VoA’s to represent MSNBC barrel bottom ratings, and RT’s ratings can be more realistically represented by FOX News. Why anyone would be surprised that by hiring MSNBC producers, you would get the same dismal results in the ratings.
So much of what you hear in the news following the 2016 Presidential election, is how Russia was meddling in our sovereign, democratic election process – again. U.S. officials on both sides of the isle express their feigned outrage,while the U.S. Government run VoA goes plugging right along, messing with the sovereignty of other nations elections. The hypocrisy is so thick, you can cut it with a knife. The real outrage should be that we’re getting our asses kicked by the Russians in social media, broadcast radio, TV PSYOP (Psychological Operations) and IO (Information Operations) like hacking.
One obvious explanation for VoA having ratings comparable to MSNBC, is that we contracted MSNBC producers to provide propaganda for America’s foreign policy narrative in Iran. One can only assume this liberal infiltration is systemic throughout VOA’s global presence. Going at least as far back as the beginning of George W. Bush’s second term, strange things began to happen with VOA’s political agenda,
The VOA’s Persian services Washington, D.C. office was managed by an Iranian/American Sheila Ganji, and it was her VOA email address published on WikiLeaks that came up in an unrelated search. According to an intra-agency report, I go into more detail on this in another post, www.blogspot.pfc40book.com and on our weekly podcast at http://www.spreaker.com/show/the-swamp. I pushed to use the public, VoA proxy servers used at that time to help Iranians get outside information, but found out Obama had cut funding for these servers within his first month or so in office. Looking back over the last 8 years of Obama, I can’t help but see a connection to him with Iran, which we are not party to.
According to the NewsMax article, a U.S. Interagency steering group submitted a report stating, “neither network has been effective at representing the views of the U.S. government, a mission defined in VOA’s charter, let alone at promoting democracy.”
In one broadcast, NewsMax reported the following;
In one April 18, 2006, program devoted to Iran’s nuclear program, for example, VOA News invited two nuclear “experts.” One of them was a Mr. Nakhai.
“VOA News did not describe his academic and/or professional affiliations. As it turns out, Mr. Nakhai was an adviser to the Iranian regime and a defender of its nuclear policy,” the report found.
Another show, broadcast on April 14, 2006, was devoted to U.S. policy toward Iran, inviting guests who were almost uniformly critical of the administration.
Here is what NewsMax quoted as the most “stunning” example;
Perhaps the most stunning comments were made by Hoover Institution scholar Abbas Milani, who recently has been called to testify in Congress as an “expert” on the pro-democracy movement in Iran by Rep. Tom Lantos, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
In a segment devoted to Iranian human rights abuses, Milani was asked how can a country that violates human rights be a defender of international human rights?
“I think that what you are saying is 100% correct, that is why the U.S. is in a problematic position because of this,” Milani replied. “An America that has the Guantanamo Bay jail in it, an America in which minorities, blacks, have suffered from legal deprivations, without a doubt has international issues with regards to this. . . .”
The VOA host thanked Milani for his answer. “Of course, the country I was referring to as the violator of human rights which cannot be a defender of international human rights was the Islamic Republic of Iran,” he added.
My jaw just dropped to the ground when I first read that. I hope all of yours did as well.
Voice of America is a fully attributable U.S. government run news organization, but there are also programs that many governments run that are somewhat less than attributable, if not entirely COVERT. These project can include building completely legitimate online news organizations, much like InfoWars.com, as an educated guess/example? Contract “journalists” will produce their deliverables to support a carefully orchestrated narrative using state of the art, tactical IIA/IO project management tools. On the left, compliments of the UK’s own GCHQ, I strongly suspect this total lunatic, Louise Mensch (@LouiseMensch), and on the right, Mike Cernovich/Jack Posobiac. I use my experience and knowledge as a subject matter expert in this to make these statements. I don’t have the resources to prove anything. I would guess worldwide there are more than a thousand fake journalists, or even real journalists, that are paid contractors.
The application I developed for the DoD while under contract for Dynology, would be a perfect example of tactical IIA/IO you would want use in such an operation. Think of it as a fake news project management application. Dynology was owned by General James Jones, former NATO Supreme Allied Commander, Obama’s National Security Advisor, and lifelong friend of John McCain. Dynology is a preferred partner with Paul Manafort’s company, whom is also friends with Brietbart’s, Steve Bannon. All of these people are deeply connected to politically motivated social media, top level elections, and the social media PSYOP application I pioneered, which anyone wanting to alter the outcome of an election through the use of social/streaming media would require. Smoking gun? No. Enough for federal investigators to look more closely at, I believe so.
VAULT 7 EXPOSED VOA/CIA CONNECTION!
I found a name online in the Vault7 document dump by WikiLeaks. I wasn’t looking for it, but rather it came up in an internet search I was doing. That said, an email address I saw led me to this article about a scathing report that came out in a 2007 NewsMax article regarding the VoA, Iran. I sent an email to the person who’s information had shown up in the online WikiLeaks CIA document dump letting them know what I had found, but did not receive a response.
What makes this article news, is my reporting on the VOA’s use of anonymized proxy servers to help spread American values throughout the world. Proxy servers allow people in countries where access to social media, like FaceBook, and many other sources of information, is blocked. Users can circumvent Geo-location filters by installing free proxy software on your computer. Unlike VOA’s TV and Radio broadcasts which are banned from viewing in Iran, you don’t need to install a large dish or antenna, which makes it easy for Iranian officials to spot. It costs pennies on the dollar compared to over the air broadcasts, and imagine what someone could do installing malware in VOA’s proxy software. Keep reading to discover what the Obama administration did to VOA’s anonymized proxy program in his first few weeks in office.
I go into more detail on this subject in my book, Victim of the Swamp: How the “Deep State” Destroyed the 40-Year-Old Private. I am trying to get a message out on a topic I have been paid heavily to corrupt, social media/fake news. As you can image, I am not getting a lot of support from online journalists. We need your help in retweeting this article to your friends and family.
WHISTLEBLOWER BOOK EXPOSES ‘TIP OF THE “DEEP STATE” SPEAR’
Announcing an Oct. 28th Book Launch and Signing at Starbucks in Clearwater, FL
Clearwater, FL, October 17, 2017– Independent publisher Patrick Bergy, author of Victim of the Swamp: How the “Deep State” Destroyed the 40-Year-Old Private, is celebrating with an official book launch at the Feather Sound Starbucks in Clearwater, Florida.
Beginning with Mr. Bergy’s non-partisan run for Supervisor of Elections in 2004, his enlistment in the Army at the age of 40, and subsequent years as a private military contractor, he strives to expose the fraud, waste, and abuse between our government, military, and the military industrial complex.
“I was a proud American with a good home, beautiful wife, and four children. I was blessed to serve at the ‘Tip of the Spear’ as a Private First Class in Afghanistan, providing Information Security. While I was taking home less than $2,000 a month after taxes, the private contractors sitting next to me were making $20,000 a month, most of which was tax-free.”
Mr. Bergy pioneered social media psychological warfare for the Defense Department from 2007-2010. He expresses concerns about the dangers of tactical social media warfare’s influence in his book, by those that seek to profit politically and financially, from both foreign and domestic threats. He exposes the dangerous relationships between the highest levels of our government and the military industrial complex, hoping to prove those responsible are also accountable.
“After years of documented retaliation by my employer and government officials for filing multiple official reports of fraud, waste, and abuse, my career was ended. After being threatened for refusing to provide classified network access to a government employee that didn’t have the required documentation, I filed my final report. The very next day they modified the multi-million-dollar contract I had been supporting for the previous 5 years, removing only my position. Within days of my departure, the contract was modified back to its original requirements, and I was replaced.”
You can purchase Patrick Bergy’s new book on Amazon, or by visiting Mr. Bergy’s crowd funding site at: www.GoFundMe.com/VictimOfTheSwamp. Event Address: 2577 Ulmerton Rd., Clearwater, Florida.
McCain, Manafort; Connections to 2016 Russian False Flag & 2010 Ukrainian Election Tampering.
by Patrick Bergy
You must assume the words that come from a politician’s mouth is simply BS until proven otherwise. Ignore this rule at your own fate! Understanding this, do you just accept John McCain’s very public anti-Russian persona? It is not my intention to question the integrity of anyone in this post, but it is important to ask direct questions, and expect direct answers. Before dismissing what I am saying, know that I spent the last decade in the deepest depths of the DC swamp. I held an above Top Secret clearance, and provided support at the highest levels of the U.S. Government, both in and out of uniform. I know how these people operate. There is nobody better to fight these people, than someone that has been a part of it. My career and life were destroyed after being let go because of having to much integrity to lie. Read the facts below and decide for yourself.
I went to work for Dynology Corporation in October, 2007. They sent me to Camp Liberty in Baghdad, Iraq in support of the Joint Psychological Operations Task Force (JOPTF) to develop pioneering technology in social media psychological operations (IIA PSYOP) and information operations (IO.) IIA, which stands for Interactive Internet Activities, was in its infancy at this time. (See IIA DoD definition at bottom of post.)
I cannot discuss what we did with the applications I helped in pioneering for the Department of Defense, or discuss anything to do with the dissemination process. There are 100’s of potential uses for an application like this, both good and bad. Once it became an off the shelf product my company made publicly available, is where my background as an SME in social media psychological warfare begins to theorize potential threats.
I urge everyone to take what I say with the highest of value, based on nearly a decade with the DoD. Dismiss ANYTHING I am telling you at your personal fate, and that of our democracy.
We lost the Iraq contract the following year in a re-compete, but Dynology was somehow allowed to maintain the intellectual property rights for the application we were paid for developing by the Department of Defense. Appears to be the rule, not the exception but I don’t understand how it would be allowed. “Image #1” above is an unclassified beta version snapshot of the iPSY application. Notice how it is capable of incorporating IO (anonymized, covert) with IIA to support tactical, computer network operations.
The defense department paid for the application to be entirely rebuilt by the company that won the re-bid and replaced us. Strangely, as you will read in my book, Victim of the Swamp, we discovered the new company didn’t know the project had an IT component, required an IIA application or two full time IT guys. They told us this while trying to get us to stay on and help them. No wonder they won as the lowest bidders. Swamp is deep folks and I don’t want to drift into an Off Topic Post. Still, it doesn’t seem like the best use of taxpayer dollars by Obama’s acting National Security advisor. I personally was tasked with producing the marketing slicks for commercial sale of this tactical social media psychological warfare application. This application can do many things. We called the retail beta version of the application iPSY. It can be used to help change the hearts and Minds of two warring factions, or in helping to move milk off the shelf at your local grocery store. The covert and anonymity capability are perfect for a Police Department to catch child Predators online.
Another thing it is capable of is altering the outcome of a presidential election. In fact, if those currently suspected of influencing the 2016 US elections were to have done it, they would require a project management tool with the exact same capabilities as what I developed for Dynology. There is an uncomfortably close relationship to ret. Gen. James Jones, Obama’s National Security Advisor. Think of it as a project management tool for coordination/ dissemination for IO (hacking/malware/covert “false flag” operations,) and IIA, for social media psychological warfare. This would include managing the narrative using fake blogs, websites and the Main stream media that any country or private project would have on their payroll. Let that sink in for a minute, and continue reading for now.
Here is where it starts to get interesting. Dynology is a family-owned business that was founded by retired 4 star Marine General James Jones. With his son, Jim Jones, at the helm.
Dynology has bid on and won Millions in defense department contracts, many while General Jones was acting in an official capacity as President Obama’s National Security Advisor!
I bet many other companies that sometimes spend hundreds of thousands of dollars if not more on bidding contracts would not be happy to find out they lost to a company that was owned by Obama’s National Security Advisor. I think most will agree the potential for abuse is unacceptable.
The close, lifelong relationship between General Jones and Senator McCain is well documented. His son, Jim Jones, worked his first job as an intern for John McCain. So we have this very well-documented relationship between John McCain, General Jones and Dynology.
Now enter Paul Manafort, the person listed in several articles, one being an article from The Huffington Post listed below, as a primary suspect in influencing the Ukrainian elections, as well as the 2016 elections here in the US. Paul Manafort’s work with John McCain campaigns go back well over a decade. John McCain has thus far simply denied any knowledge of Paul Manafort and his work with the Ukrainian election in 2010. McCain’s denial did not seem to sit well with the Huffington Post reporter, as McCain and Manafort shared an office during that time.
Could John McCain have potentially organized a tactical IIA/IO that was designed to show collusion between President Trump, his campaign staff and the Russians? McCain’s lifelong relationship with General Jones, Obama’s National Security Advisor and NATO Supreme Allied Commander, and the development of social media psychological warfare applications by Dynology, would suggest this is who John McCain would reach out to.
As Obama’s former National Security advisor, General Jones would make a powerful Ally with strong ties to the intelligence community. Dynology’s technical capabilities and having people in place at the highest level in our intelligence community would be required to accomplish what reports suggest Paul Manafort was involved with. With all the speculation going around regarding the Russian narrative, I’ve never heard anyone ask and answer the question of how they would do it?
This theory goes a long way towards answering that question of how. If true, it would likely provide investigators with a trail to follow the money. You don’t just wake up one day and decide to alter the outcome of the U.S. (or Ukrainian) presidential election by calling The Geek Squad. These are covert, multi-million-dollar operations that require battlefield tested applications, anonymized proxy servers, likely in a server rack in Prague, project managers and analysts. I am not a strong believer in coincidence, and thus far John McCain’s excuse is ignorance – on 3 separate occasions.
Below is a link to the Google Way Back Machine snapshot of Paul Manafort’s corporate website.
I came across this link in the WikiLeaks, Vault7 CIA files, for those of you keeping score…
If you’re looking for the swamp, look no further than the relationship between our government, the military, and the military industrial complex. Contractors, like me, provide plausible deniability to our clients in the government. This is why military contractors are used so frequently comma and show up so often in situations like Hillary Clinton’s email server, where the contractor was responsible for the server, yet so many emails were destroyed or missing. Clinton’s system administrator plead the 5th during Senate hearings, and there was nothing in the law to go after him and compel him to answer.
Contractors, contrary to popular belief, do not have protection under US whistle-blower laws. If a contractor did speak up, that contractor would ruin his career and his life. Believe me, I know this to be true from first-hand experience. My life in career was destroyed after coming forward with an official report of fraud waste and abuse.
If we are ever to drain the swamp, we need to begin by providing strong whistle-blower protection to those who are willing to speak out, even at their own personal risk. We do not abandon these people or throw them under the bus, they are the only way we will ever drain the swamp.